Dear Team Wayartok!
I’m sorry for not meeting the deadline established by Phoebe – thank you for your understanding. I would like to present you my project proposal.
I hope it will be clear&understable, I tried to keep the pattern that Henko used in his proposal. Give me a few minutes more and I will post my thoughts on your proposals
1) My research summary:First of all, Nunavut is a very differentiated region when talking about capabilities and means of its communities. There are no road connecting any communities. There are incredible differences between the capital of the region – Iqualuit – and ‘settlements’ without infrastructure. The reality of living in Nunavut has changed during last 50 years and this was a rapid change. Traditional community life was based on strong family bonds, a typical occupation was hunting, fur trading. People used melted ice to cook, hunted animals were the source of not only meat and fur, but also fat, bones, thongs. Communities were self-sufficient. Currently Iqualuit becomes a well-developed city, that attracts youths from all over the Arctic, gives opportunities of self-development, creates employments. It establishes a trend to follow the American/European culture. It is an opposition to the traditional Inuit lifestyle, which changed due to the unification of the civilized world (globalization).
The ecosystem is no longer stable and it affects animals live a lot. Polar bears give birth and hunt on sea ice. Less winter sea ice means that female polar bears have to go longer without food, which impacts their fat stores, and, in turn, their reproductive success. For the seals not only does sea ice provide a home for resting, giving birth and raising pups, it is also a feeding ground for some of them. There is also the case of marine food web based on ice algae – adapted to different water temperature. It all threatens to collapse the traditional for Inuits way of nourishment: fishing and sealing in the region of Nunavut.
Moreover, European boycotts caused a decrease in prices of seal fur and thus other export goods from Nunavut.
Young people have now to get an education and start mental work, which is contradictory to their tradition (I’m extremely sorry for the way it sounds, but I didn’t know how to express it differently – language difficulties
). Some families can not send their children to schools because they need kids to work (
poverty level in Nunavut is extremely high, in 2001 virtually half of Nunavut households experienced food insecurity without sufficient food to eat because of a lack of money), other live in places deprived of access to education. Parents have troubles with fitting into the new yuppie-dominated world of computers, sterile offices and advanced education.
A huge social problem of Nunavut is
unemployment (about 80-90%) There are several social organizations to fight it (for example ‘Roundtable for Poverty Reduction’ who I contacted, but didn’t get any feedback until now), but they don’t seem to be very effective. Why? While carrying out my research on Nunavut, I discovered that most of jobs that are thought to be well-paid are these in governmental structures. And here is where my question comes: is a community with such an unemployment rate and lack of money able to create another association, organization, department? ‘Like it or not, Nunavut’s government just doesn’t have enough money to do what ought to be done.’ ‘So far, the creation of Nunavut has brought economic benefits to a select few – those who have been lucky enough to find lucrative jobs and contracts within the new land claim bureaucracies and within the Nunavut government. Many of these are non-Inuit newcomers.’ With poor and expensive transportation links
most jobs are in the service industry (teachers, nursing jobs, working in local stores)
and working directly for the Nunavut government.Some young people still want to pursue traditional life styles which means living off the land (hunting, trapping etc.) but most of young people who get jobs end up in the service industry.
The next case I would like to discuss is the
role of schools in Nunavut. Together with Henko we contacted various organizations (more or less fortunately) and at least in my feeling, principals of local schools were most involved and positive about our project. They seemed to have a great sense of duty and to be devoted to their job.
Schools reunion youths from different settlements and give them the tools to earn a living in future, adult life (by education). As far as my knowledge is concerned children learn at school subjects like maths, literature or biology, but also technical skills – for example assorted shop courses
(woodworking, metal working (welding), and electrical courses). The education is provided in Inuktitut or Inuinnaqtun (depends on the community) and English or French.
Poor students attendance is a huge problem: the average attendance in kindergarten to 12 grade in all of Nunavut is approximately 70%, but for one of the schools I contacted it was just 52%. Public education is fully paid by the government of Nunavut. Only 25% of students end up graduating, most kids drop out by grade 8.
With the highest birth rate in Canada and the fact that over half of Nunavummiut are under 25
it is necessary to popularize and allow education to more youths, but also to their parents who have only inadequate job skills.How to do it? Eva Aariak, second premier of Nunavut, says: ‘Inuit children need to learn in an environment that nurtures their culture and language’. I would like to add that this: Inuit children must become proud of their culture and history, become eager to share it. Schools should promote a healthy style of living, educate not only in the direction of knowledge that is provided to kids all over the world but also about their motherland, ecosystem protection, it should introduce educational programs on waste segregation, water safety, physical activities. School should also teach skills that are
important for the parents, so they estimate and value these institutions. I like the idea of
free meals in school canteens as a way of financial aid for families and a factor in improving the image of schools. To get out children from the general atmosphere of depression (another common problem of Inuits: substance abuse, crimes, suicide) we must give them something to work on, something worth devoting their time to.
2) Aims of our project:- Popularizing education in Nunavut
- Encouraging self-esteem in young Inuits, improving their national pride, upbringing future leaders
- Teaching useful skills
- Introducing ecological education to education system
3) Who shall we involve in our project?- Young Explorers community (Pen Pal program, cultural exchange programs)
- Schools from all over the world to exchange knowledge
- Travelers magazines from all over the world – it is necessary that European (and not only!) countries learn more about the region and culture of Nunavut to have a better understanding of Inuits actions
4) Education&school popularizing can be incorporated by:- Fun activities during expedition (same as Henko proposed, but with some further modifications, I think that all of the ideas presented shall be discussed)
- Teaching useful skills – water safety, dog sledges, arts (parents could be invited to look and learn as well)
- Financial aid for families by distributing free meals at school canteens for children in need
- Animals-care program
5) How to raise public awareness?a) Internationally:
- Media (artificial environment of Internet, TV, radio…)
- Traveler’s magazines
- Young Explorers community website: art competition, events patronized by this project…
- Schools from all over the world (conducted by Young Explorers and their friends)
b) In Nunavut:
- Schools
- Local sources of information: journals, newspapers, governmental centers
- Posters